Re: Staining Human Dendritic Cells

Paul J. Jansen (zinetti@acpub.duke.edu)
Thu, 15 Aug 1996 13:24:51 -0400 (EDT)

In my experience in staining DC's derived from monocytes, I have found
that usually it is not a pure culture of DC's. The DC's tend to bind
other cells in the "mix". This can give autoflourescence if you gate on
the largest cell populations in your FSC/SSC histogram. The largest
populations in my experience are clusters of 2 cells, 1 DC and 1 other cell.
Also in my experience there can be some monocytes in the culture, and
monocytes can nonspecifically bind to your antibodies. Since you have
done some microscopy you probably have seen some evidence of cell-cell
binding. My suggestion is to along with your prep of cultured DC's you
run some freshly isolated DC's (non-cultured).
good Luck
cya
Paul J Jansen
DUMC Immunology
http://www.duke.edu/~zinetti/Immunology/immuno1.html

On Thu, 15 Aug 1996, Bob Craggs wrote:

> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 14:03:42 +0200
> From: Bob Craggs <Bob.R.I.Craggs@CHARNWOOD.GB.ASTRA.COM>
> To: Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
> Subject: Staining Human Dendritic Cells
>
>
>
> Greetings to the Cytometry list.
>
> As a relatively new member of the list, this is my first
> request for help.
>
> Colleagues have asked me to perform phenotyping on human
> blood-derived dendritic cells that they have produced in
> culture after 8 days in the presence of GMCSF and IL4.
>
> My first attempt revealed very high levels of
> autofluorescence (detectable in both the FITC and PE
> channels) in all the large cells (approx. 60% of the total
> population) that they had scraped off their plates. This was
> confirmed by fluorescent microscopy. With the gains set so
> that the background of the unstained small cells was at the
> left of my scale, the autofluorescence was at the end of the
> 2nd log of intensity on my Coulter XL cytometer. Consequently
> only those markers with intensity greater than the
> autofluorescence showed any 'specific' staining (e.g.: Class
> II MHC & CD40).
>
> I am following the methods and markers as published in the
> following paper:
>
> Sallusto & Lanzavecchia. J Exp Med 179: 1109-1118 (1994).
> Romani et al. J Exp Med 180: 83-93 (1994).
> Blauvelt et al. J Invest Dermatol 106: 1047-1052 (1996).
>
> None of these authors make any reference to problems with, or
> needs to quench, autofluorescence.
>
> So please, has anyone any experience of similar problems and
> knows how to solve them, or has anyone any suggestions that
> might be worth a try? Are there methods for quenching
> cytoplasmic staining while leaving surface staining intact?
> Could it be something as simple as the cells taking-up the
> Phenol Red from the RPMI medium?
>
> Thanking you all in advance,
>
> Bob Craggs,
> Dept of Biochemistry,
> Astra Charnwood,
> Bakewell Road,
> Loughborough, Leics,
> LE11 5RH, U.K..
>
> Tel: +44 1509 64 4055, FAX: +44 1509 64 5557,
> E-mail: Bob.Craggs@Charnwood.GB.Astra.Com
>
>
>


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors Web Sites
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu