 |
 |
 |
 |
Keith Bahjat
Chicago, IL
>Well, we have used both CyChrome and PcP, and we like PcP. CyChrome was
>very bright and made compensation a nightmare, whereas PcP was dimmer,
>yet this resulted in much easier compensation. BD FACscan one laser is
>the machine we use.
>CAVEAT: PcP is VERY expensive.
>cya
>BZ
>ps your milage may vary, I was told that noone in thier right mind would
>want to use the "dimmer" PcP, yet the results we get are very nice thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, 4 Sep 1996, steven micko wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 04 Sep 96 09:02:46 EST
>> From: steven micko <steven_micko@email.eushc.org>
>> To: Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
>> Subject: CyChrome & PerCP
>>
>>
>>
>> Can anyone give me information on the chemical structure (in a general
>> way), excitation/emission information, and stability information on the
>> two fluorochromes, CyChrome (Pharmingen) and PerCP (B-D)? I'm not
>> interested in violating anybody's proprietary information. I just want to
>> know what I'm dealing with. So far all I have been able to get is
>> marketing stuff (i.e. ours is better than theirs).
>>
>> Is there anything in the literature?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Steve Micko
>> Emory Hospital
>> Atlanta
>>
-- Keith Bahjat Northwestern University Kbahjat@nwu.edu
|
|
|
|